Some time less vaccum is better more vaccum is overkill

Calgary Hog

Active Member
Aug 4, 2018
109
50
28
Real Name
Tinnam
TM Vacuum..sometimes less is more...
TM Vacuum..sometimes less is more...
Direct Link To This Post
This is one of my best articles I wrote on how vacuum works in a TM. Remember this was written 2 years before I brought out teflon glides, so some of the figures mentioned at the wands WCI have been exceeded since I wrote this:

TM Vacuum- Sometimes less is more!
Posted By Kenneth Harris on 6/28/2001 at 10:15 PM
With all the talk we hear/see on this board about TM power levels and cfm output, i would like to tell you what it takes to have a great vacuum system for a TM system without all the marketing info that seems to accompany these numbers.

Vacuum can be measured in two ways; inches of lift and air flow(cfm).A brief discussion of these 2 terms is needed so that you can understand the relative importance of each and ways that you can manage both to arrive at an efficent vacuum system.


1) AIR FLOW (CFM)

This is the volume of air flow that actually takes the soil out of the carpet.Without enough air flow,carpets are left wetter and soil removal is not maximized.Carpets take longer to dry and customers are left unhappy!So clearly this is an important to get right. How much is enough? To get the answer to that question, you have to know where the most restrictive part of the air flow system is.

On any TM system , that will be found on inlet side of the system, because you have to rely on atmospheric pressure of 14.7 lb/sq. in. to fill the system whereas the exhaust side moves the air out under pressure of the blower.The inlet side consists of a vacuum tank,100+ ft of hose,and usually a cleaning wand.

a) Vacuum Tank : Not too much restriction here. Most tanks have a 2" outlet on them that will allow 300-400 cfm of air flow to enter the tank in open flow(no hose attached).Most important consideration here is to size the tank right in relation to the blower to keep the rise time of the system to a reasonable value.

b)Hose : Here 2" hose is what you need to use to keep cfm up and minimize frictional losses.Most 2" hose will handle 300 cfm of airflow well at 12HG(164" WL)before these losses get too great. But since vacuum hose losses about 25" WL/100 ft; it is wise to limit the length that you use.Since in residential cleaning only 100 ft or so is needed,this is not a problem.The 10' whip hose that is often used with the 2" hose to fit on to the 1.5" tubed wand is likewise not too restrictive as it will allow up to 250 cfm of air flow thru when used at this length.

c)Cleaning Wand : This is where the real restriction lays.When the wand is on the carpet, a tremendous restriction exists to the air flowing into the wand at the interface with the carpet.Wands with the standard 1/4" deep slot at the lips will only allow about 12.5 cfm/inch of wand width into the wand lips when on the carpet.The following figures show what this means in terms of real world cfm:

12" wand......150 cfm *
14" wand......175 cfm *
16" wand......200 cfm *

* - measured at 12"HG at 110 ft.
Now, since most truckmounts come with 12" wide wands you can see just how much this restiction really is.But it shows one other thing. If you can't flow more than 150 cfm; why do you need a large blower for your TM? Below are some of the cfm ratings for the most common blowers:

#33..........175 cfm
#36..........280 cfm
#45..........320 cfm
#47..........405 cfm

As you can see, all but the #33 will max out the capacity of the above wands when they are on the carpet.The need for for cfm for WD and dual wanding will be dealt with later.

2) VACUUM LIFT

Once the cfm capacity of the wand has been satisfied(200cfm),the next thing to get right is the vacuum's lift.This measures the pressure drop in the system and measures that systems ability to do work (clean carpets), by overcoming the resistance to flow(the wand/carpet interface).Say you have a vacuum reading of 12"HG showing on your gauge when the wand is on the carpet.Does this meanthat all this vacuum goes to work to cause air/water/soil to enter your wand? No. To find out why you must find out what "working vacuum " is.

The resistance of your system is determined in the main by how much air your tring to flow thru it. What this means is a larger blower will cause a higher resistance in your system just by tring to drawing air thru the hose without a wand attached!This running vacuum does no work. Say your reading is 12HG with the wand on the floor.Now lift it off and the reading is 8"HG.The difference between these two numbers is your working vacuum,or 4"HG. You want this number to be as large as possible to have an efficient vacuum system!But the larger the blower you use ,the less this number becomes. the following are some real readinds i obtained from various blower equipped TM's :

#47.......12"total.....8"RV.....=4"WV
#45.......12"total.....5"RV.....=7"WV
#33.......12"total.....3"RV.....=9"WV

The above illustrates how the smaller blower equipped TM's are more efficient with there vacuum and can still dry carpet in a couple of hours.Because the #47 equipped TM has less working vacuum than the #45 TM ,i often see the carpet dry in less time than the identical job done by the #47!The reason is they are both at 12"HG,but the wand will not let the additional cfm it produces get to the carpet; so the more efficient vacuum of the #45 wins out.


Now that the limitations of trying to move much more than 200 cfm past the wand have been shown,what do you do if you want to dual wand, or need more cfm for WD? Get a true dual wand system that uses 2 separate vacuum tanks; like the Split-Steam sold by Advanced Cleaning. You will then have all the efficency that a small blower equipped TM provides(with it's high working vacuum),plus the ability to double your production by putting another man on the other wand!In a WD situation this set-up will also suck the water out of those basements fasterthan a large blower equipped TM could with 1 hose .

It is really a case of win-win.


Ken Harris Turboteck Supplies
Back to Top
Direct Link To This Post
Mercrewser 10/December/2006 at 8:45pm
Quote Mercrewser
Quote
Post Reply
Reply
yeah, but those big blowers sound so cool....... ( sorry)


You make a good point. Do you have a conversion formula for Water lift to mercury? I think my dash mounted vac gauge (HG) is inop, and I have a portable water lift gage that I want to use to check it.
Back to Top
Direct Link To This Post
Superglide Ken 10/December/2006 at 11:39pm
Quote Superglide Ken
Quote
Post Reply
Reply
13.8" WL = 1" HG.
Back to Top
Direct Link To This Post
EcoSurface 18/March/2018 at 2:46am
Quote EcoSurface
Quote
Post Reply
Reply
Interesting read. As for me whose spent time comparing cfm, lifts and now learning about having a proper wand length also this definitely was intuitive so thank you. I couldn’t quite grasp some of it, new to the industry.

Limit the reach of the hose to 100 ft or less
16” wand collects more
200 cfm works better than the bigger guys
Lift I’m unsure of because I notice a lot of companies measure it by the water lift in” as your method is better in regards to actual measures of it doing the actual job. What number of lift in” is ideal?

New to these forums I see the infield experience and knowledge yet to the green horns it’s all new information and they don’t want to fall overboard. Thanks for the info.

What are you’re suggestions for a reputable company model for a start up? I’m interested in helping the facilities associated with, they get a lot of traffic and the carpets and sofas have seen better days, cleanong all the gunk is a top concern and mind you there’s a lot of steps so I think the ETM and strong portable are way to go.
 

sbsscn

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2009
2,936
1,048
113
california
Real Name
Arm Ben
Business Location
United States
Tell me about it.

I recently went to clean a chair I had the vacuum to lowest setting, my tool also had a vac release. As I cleaned the fabric started to come apart. I stopped the work, showed and compensated the owner, cost was low (thank GOD!) I did everything right in inspecting it and evaluating the chair but Vacuum was too strong and the fabric was just not strong enough to hold. Fiber was Nylon, but piece was over 30 years old.
 

Jim Davisson

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2016
4,387
5,323
113
Serving the greater Charlotte area
Real Name
James Davisson
Business Location
United States
Couple points about the above article, lift at the wand will determine cfm. High lift systems will have increased cfm at the end of the hose run vs a low lift system. 2.5 hose changes everything. The guy running 20 hg gets more cfm through 2" hose and the wand than the guy running just 12" hg. Balance is key for your equipment and typical hose run. Monster heat and high lift is really necessary for crazy long hose runs and dual wanding for maintaining good performance at 400 feet or 200 each dual wanding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Calgary Hog

OxiFreshGuy

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2016
3,130
2,329
113
Real Name
Boris Johnson
Business Location
United States
Well Jim, are you saying all these portie fellas claiming its just as good as a TM are not necessarily comparing apples to apples?

=)>
 

Calgary Hog

Active Member
Aug 4, 2018
109
50
28
Real Name
Tinnam
Well I think Jim is telling equipment is as good as it's intent and specs are both allighned. My Etm will never rival a Monster Truck Mount. As my equipment is strong till 200feet and can perform at 220 feet after that I will need in line booster.
But then again she is designed to work for 200 feet and saves me more money and time on maintaining it. But yes strong portables and ETMs have came long way now.
 

Jim Davisson

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2016
4,387
5,323
113
Serving the greater Charlotte area
Real Name
James Davisson
Business Location
United States
Well Jim, are you saying all these portie fellas claiming its just as good as a TM are not necessarily comparing apples to apples?

=)>

Most porty jobs I'm running 35 feet of hose with more flow than 95% of the TM's out there. Balance is key.
 

pgcleaner

Active Member
Nov 4, 2020
291
61
28
Real Name
Matthew Olive
So the harder the blower sucks, the more resistance it creates along the hose line?

And the more resistance there is, the less available vacuum power there is?

My 33 blower has the vac relief set to 17 Hg, but it runs at about 8 Hg with an open 2 inch hose at 100 feet. I guess that leaves me with 9 available Hg. Sound right?

So by raising the vacuum releif limit from the stock 14 Hg to 17 Hg, the machine is only sucking hard when it absolutely has to, and when it needs the extra power, the vac relief system will allow it more room to work.

But here's a catch. Electric vacuum motors do not have a vac releif system.

So how does that play into the ETM vs TM vacuum power debate?

Genuinely curious.
 

mrotto

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2009
3,473
2,270
113
Wisconsin
Real Name
Paul Ottensmann
Business Location
United States
well I have never done any testing and all due respect to Ken Harris as one of the legends in the industry.

But I am a practical thinker, a logical thinker.

As an example, I dont need to test to know that I will remove more moisture using the same machine and same hose run if Im cleaning on the second floor vs the basement.

So I have to question that the wider the wand, the more moisture you will remove. Take it to the extreme and hes saying that if you have a 24 inch wand, it will dry the carpet faster than a 10 inch wand. To me, having the same vacuum over a wider surface would reduce the overall amount of moisture removed.

Could be wrong, but it just doesnt make sense.
 

OxiFreshGuy

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2016
3,130
2,329
113
Real Name
Boris Johnson
Business Location
United States
well I have never done any testing and all due respect to Ken Harris as one of the legends in the industry.

But I am a practical thinker, a logical thinker.

As an example, I dont need to test to know that I will remove more moisture using the same machine and same hose run if Im cleaning on the second floor vs the basement.

So I have to question that the wider the wand, the more moisture you will remove. Take it to the extreme and hes saying that if you have a 24 inch wand, it will dry the carpet faster than a 10 inch wand. To me, having the same vacuum over a wider surface would reduce the overall amount of moisture removed.

Could be wrong, but it just doesnt make sense.

Potentially he is correct though - a 24 inch wand may provide more suction. Same as if I put a 1.5 inch hose on my mount I am restricting airflow. a 10 inch wand may be restricting airflow.