Client sent email - Are you vaccinated? How would you reply?

mrotto

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2009
3,476
2,271
113
Wisconsin
Real Name
Paul Ottensmann
Business Location
United States
Well the FDA is going to approve the vaccine.

Dr. Anthony Fauci said over the weekend that he hopes the vaccines will be fully approved by federal drug regulators in “the next few weeks,” noting in another interview that he believes a “flood” of vaccine mandates will be handed down after that.

So this is assuming that Fauci gets what he wants? Nope. To be approved, the drug has a rigorous procedure that it has to go through. BUT recently they approved a drug where they changed the rules.


note the part -

for new drugs to be approved under the normal process, they must show efficacy. Efficacy is typically defined as a drug treatment group significantly outperforming a placebo group for the registered outcome. In both of the Phase 3 clinical trials, this was not the case.

However, a secondary analysis (an unplanned analysis) showed that at a high dose of Aduhelm there was some (weak) evidence of benefit for the drug group over the placebo.

Nonetheless, in this case the FDA changed to a different criterion from the one that their advisory group was told to consider during their evaluation of the request to approve the drug. FDA changed to a criterion allowed for accelerated approval.

So when the system does not work to their liking, they change the rules. Same will apply here.

Im so glad I dont have to worry about my employer mandating a vaccine.
 

keep it clean

Premium VIP
Dec 3, 2012
14,513
8,296
113
Real Name
Nick
Business Location
United States
Well the FDA is going to approve the vaccine.

Dr. Anthony Fauci said over the weekend that he hopes the vaccines will be fully approved by federal drug regulators in “the next few weeks,” noting in another interview that he believes a “flood” of vaccine mandates will be handed down after that.

So this is assuming that Fauci gets what he wants? Nope. To be approved, the drug has a rigorous procedure that it has to go through. BUT recently they approved a drug where they changed the rules.


note the part -

for new drugs to be approved under the normal process, they must show efficacy. Efficacy is typically defined as a drug treatment group significantly outperforming a placebo group for the registered outcome. In both of the Phase 3 clinical trials, this was not the case.

However, a secondary analysis (an unplanned analysis) showed that at a high dose of Aduhelm there was some (weak) evidence of benefit for the drug group over the placebo.

Nonetheless, in this case the FDA changed to a different criterion from the one that their advisory group was told to consider during their evaluation of the request to approve the drug. FDA changed to a criterion allowed for accelerated approval.

So when the system does not work to their liking, they change the rules. Same will apply here.

Im so glad I dont have to worry about my employer mandating a vaccine.
Completely discredits everything they are about. After this you’ll need to question is the food safe? Everyday over the counter drugs? Whats actually safe and what was just pushed through with the right amount of grease money and politics.
Going to be hard to trust anything or anyone from this point on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrotto

wandwizard

Randy Dockins
Premium VIP
Nov 12, 2008
9,282
3,861
113
Real Name
Randy Dockins
Business Location
United States
I don't think there is any truth to it whatsoever. The CDC recently admitted there was a problem with the PCR test. They actually stated and this is almost an exact quote, "we cannot distinguish between Covid 19 and the seasonal flu." Yet, that has been by a landslide the primary way a "Covid Case" or death has been determined for over a year and a half!!! I just watched this very brief but telling video on Rumble earlier.
 

rob allen

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Sep 5, 2007
39,415
20,223
113
Va.
www.drynclean.com
Real Name
Robert Allen,Jr.
Business Location
United States
Iverme ctins had over 3.7 billion doses administered over the last decades. It’s been used by several countries and has over 40 peer reviewed to its effectiveness. Yet it’s banned in several 1st world countries for C. Even Google has censored (who by the way owns 12% of Vaccitech) and banned the mention of Iv vermectin.
 

rob allen

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Sep 5, 2007
39,415
20,223
113
Va.
www.drynclean.com
Real Name
Robert Allen,Jr.
Business Location
United States
Are we being vaccinated to death?
 

Attachments

  • 3566338E-BF7C-4BC5-8EAF-024500550E4F.jpeg
    3566338E-BF7C-4BC5-8EAF-024500550E4F.jpeg
    108.1 KB · Views: 30

wandwizard

Randy Dockins
Premium VIP
Nov 12, 2008
9,282
3,861
113
Real Name
Randy Dockins
Business Location
United States
Iverme ctins had over 3.7 billion doses administered over the last decades. It’s been used by several countries and has over 40 peer reviewed to its effectiveness. Yet it’s banned in several 1st world countries for C. Even Google has censored (who by the way owns 12% of Vaccitech) and banned the mention of Iv vermectin.
It doesn't matter to those in power how well Ivermectin or any of the other totally proven treatments that can either save your life or prevent you from getting serious symptoms. They would rather literally kill thousands upon thousands of people than give them treatments that actually have been around for years and are extremely safe. Ivermectin is just one of those drugs. There is a very clear agenda going on to literally vaccinate the world and I do believe there are some extremely sinister motives behind it with those very few who are really in power. They are NOT "following the science", but their own evil agendas. The suppression of drugs that could have saved countless thousands is nothing short of WICKED beyond belief. God WILL hold these people accountable and I mean every single one of them.
 

mrotto

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2009
3,476
2,271
113
Wisconsin
Real Name
Paul Ottensmann
Business Location
United States
I don't think there is any truth to it whatsoever. The CDC recently admitted there was a problem with the PCR test. They actually stated and this is almost an exact quote, "we cannot distinguish between Covid 19 and the seasonal flu." Yet, that has been by a landslide the primary way a "Covid Case" or death has been determined for over a year and a half!!! I just watched this very brief but telling video on Rumble earlier.
yep!

 
  • Like
Reactions: Fedri

mrotto

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2009
3,476
2,271
113
Wisconsin
Real Name
Paul Ottensmann
Business Location
United States
After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.


Visit the FDA website for a list of authorized COVID-19 diagnostic methods. For a summary of the performance of FDA-authorized molecular methods with an FDA reference panel, visit this page.


In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.

so why wait till December 31 if they are available now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fedri

mrotto

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2009
3,476
2,271
113
Wisconsin
Real Name
Paul Ottensmann
Business Location
United States
OK, they are going to change the testing as of Dec 31 right? Well you know the company that makes those COVID testing swabs? George Soros and Bill Gates just bought the company and are taking it private.


Nothing wrong here....
 

Fedri

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2015
4,479
2,354
113
Mississauga Canada
Real Name
Fedri Irsat
I don't think there is any truth to it whatsoever. The CDC recently admitted there was a problem with the PCR test. They actually stated and this is almost an exact quote, "we cannot distinguish between Covid 19 and the seasonal flu." Yet, that has been by a landslide the primary way a "Covid Case" or death has been determined for over a year and a half!!! I just watched this very brief but telling video on Rumble earlier.
Desantis explains it here.
 

wandwizard

Randy Dockins
Premium VIP
Nov 12, 2008
9,282
3,861
113
Real Name
Randy Dockins
Business Location
United States
OK, they are going to change the testing as of Dec 31 right? Well you know the company that makes those COVID testing swabs? George Soros and Bill Gates just bought the company and are taking it private.


Nothing wrong here....
Yeah, two of the biggest criminal master minds in the world are now partners. What could go wrong? Of course every single PCR test since day one has been fraudulent. It was so fortunate that the inventor of that test died in August of 2019 just a few short months before the first case which may have been as early as October or November. Kary Mullis has explained clearly what the PCR CAN DO and what it CANNOT do. It was also used fraudulently to do AIDS testing and Mullis was not pleased about that at all. The PCR test is a smoke screen and a sham. It makes it appear that even healthy, asymptomatic individuals are "super spreaders" who carry Covid 19 around and may kill you at any moment. It's a lie and I believe a deliberate propaganda. Nothing about this is accidental. All we are going through with the "asymptomatic transmission" "high case counts" "Covid deaths", and the mask wearing is largely supported by a test that is "not fit for purpose."


Do you see any correlation with what Mullis said in this video and what's going on now? I certainly do!!!


Kary Mullis on Rumble.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Fedri

mrotto

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2009
3,476
2,271
113
Wisconsin
Real Name
Paul Ottensmann
Business Location
United States
my take on all this.

the mask or not to mask, get the vax or not, battle is only a deflection of what is going to happen.

We know that the World Banks have always wanted a Global Economy and Global currency. We know that the Fed will have its own cryto currency. We know that we already have vaccine passports, but they are on paper and tech companies are creating an electronic passport. We know that the Dems are all upset because fake passports are being printed. We know that people travel worldwide so now each country has to be familiar with the other countries paper passports

Is it too far fetched to reason that the World needs one, electronic Vax Passport to make it easier? What a great way to track where everyone goes!

Is it too far fetched to reason that the World needs one electronic currency to make things easier? What a great way to track what everyone spends!

Hence, no freedom!