Cant decide on new tile tools HELP!

fuzzsucker

Active Member
Jul 14, 2008
327
106
43
Colorado Springs, CO
Real Name
Robert Yockel
Let me mention first what I am needing. Speed and not taking up alot of room in my truck.

I have always been hearing great things about the turbo hybrid. However the bulky nature of the tool leads me to look at the new set up by hydro force. They have one wand that can run many interchangeable heads. Also the sx15 head is bigger, i assume faster. I also don't seem to find much enjoyment out of the wide dual handle set up of most tiles tools. The wand handle fits better in the van and i find it more natural to use a wand set up.

Anyone have any feedback on that new setup? I see interlink has a black Friday deal on them on Dec 1. So I gotta pull the trigger on this pretty soon if Im gonna make the buy.

Thanks for your help!
 

fuzzsucker

Active Member
Jul 14, 2008
327
106
43
Colorado Springs, CO
Real Name
Robert Yockel
that's what i keep hearing. i usually always keep the vac adjustment all the way open. I run a bigger machine and having it closed at all makes it hard to even move. Just trying to decide if that is the buying decision. that auto adjust is pretty awesome from what i hear.
 

suncarpet

Staff member
Moderator
Premium VIP
Jul 18, 2013
5,107
4,309
113
47
Bakersfield ca
www.suncarpet.net
Real Name
Rob mueller
Business Location
United States
Bulky?? Huh its not to big pussy.:p
ImageUploadedByTMF Forums1417351793.412214.jpg

ImageUploadedByTMF Forums1417351819.346102.jpg

ImageUploadedByTMF Forums1417351843.692057.jpg

 

fuzzsucker

Active Member
Jul 14, 2008
327
106
43
Colorado Springs, CO
Real Name
Robert Yockel
Like a sign from above the day after I get a craigslist notification and I got sx12 and 4 inch hand tool for $300. Just like magic and I love both of them. Here is some pics.
 

Attachments

  • 1417662165875.jpg
    1417662165875.jpg
    67 KB · Views: 164
  • 1417662187796.jpg
    1417662187796.jpg
    52.3 KB · Views: 162
  • 1417662218073.jpg
    1417662218073.jpg
    71.6 KB · Views: 154
  • 1417662243849.jpg
    1417662243849.jpg
    64.2 KB · Views: 174