Stakeholders Reject Green Seal Cleaning Product Standard

Discussion in 'Breaking News, Classes, Contests & Specials' started by Jeff Ellis, Oct 22, 2008.

  1. Jeff Ellis Banned

    Member Since:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Message Count:
    475
    Location:
    Greenwood, SC
    Ratings Received:
    +47 / 0 / -0
    WASHINGTON, Sept. 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Today, a coalition of
    concerned stakeholders* released the following statement criticizing Green
    Seal's newly published Environmental Standard for Industrial and
    Institutional Cleaners (GS-37) as fundamentally flawed. (*see list below)

    The process Green Seal implemented to develop GS-37 fell far short of
    being "fair, unbiased and credible." As organizations directly involved in
    the development of this standard, we are deeply disappointed by Green
    Seal's process and cannot recognize GS-37 as a valid, consensus-based
    standard.

    On August 29, Green Seal published a final standard even though:



    1. the most recent draft standard was rejected by stakeholder vote;
    2. the substantive deficiencies that led to this opposition remained
    unresolved; and
    3. stakeholders were never given an opportunity to review the revised final
    standard prior to its formal release.
    As a result, the current new standard is not a consensus-based
    standard, a stated objective by Green Seal at the start of this process.

    Throughout the standard development process, our organizations
    consistently commented that numerous criteria in GS-37 lack sufficient
    scientific basis. These concerns were not adequately addressed, leading to
    sustained opposition when stakeholders voted on the November 2007 proposed
    standard. While Green Seal took some steps to address these deficiencies,
    we believe many areas of sustained opposition remain unresolved.

    Green Seal failed to provide its stakeholders an opportunity to review
    the revised document, which includes definitions and language that had
    never appeared in previous drafts, prior to its publication. Green Seal
    cannot credibly claim to have overcome opposition when registered
    stakeholders were shut out of this critical final step. The result is a
    flawed standard that lacks the factual and scientific basis to guide
    purchasing decisions. Such an approach violates Green Seal's own principles
    and procedural requirements of respected standard setting organizations
    that Green Seal claims to meet.

    We urge Green Seal to immediately withdraw GS-37 and reinitiate its
    inappropriately abrogated standard development process, engaging
    stakeholders to develop a truly science-based, consensus standard.

    * New York State Chemical Alliance

    Alkylphenol Ethoxylates Research Council

    American Chemistry Council

    Carpet and Rug Institute

    Consumer Specialty Products Association

    Reckitt Benckiser, Inc.

    SI Group, Inc.

    The Fragrance Materials Association

    The Soap and Detergent Association

    Zep, Inc.



    SOURCE The Soap and Detergent Association

Share This Page